Cold/High Anaerobic Digestion Community of Practice

Evaluating the potential to use poop pathogen reduction as an energy resource for remote cold/ high altitude communities. Can the energy balance for anaerobic digestion work?

Scope of Activities

logo graphic: a brown outhouse on green mountains with two large green leaves growing from its roof

The goal of the Cold/High Anaerobic Digestion Community of Practice is to develop anaerobic digestion systems that are deployable in Arctic, sub-Arctic, and high-altitude rural areas to address sanitation issues and potentially provide a source of renewable energy.

While anaerobic digestion has been used for hundreds of years to treat human and animal waste and generate methane as an energy source, research on the feasibility of implementing these systems in Arctic, sub-Arctic, and high elevation ecosystems is limited and largely anecdotal. This consortium formed therefore to collect and consolidate information on anaerobic digestion of waste for these communities. We are also working to determine the feasibility of the multi-benefit use of anaerobic digestion for energy generation, as the cost and logistics of diesel for home heating in remote communities is an economic burden for these communities and has been found to be a cause of elevated childhood asthma rates.

To bolster these efforts, this group is collaborating with the Global Methane Initiative (GMI) to initiate studies and anaerobic digestion pilots as part of GMI's international focus on reducing barriers to recovering methane as a clean energy source.

Poop is a resource. Let's use it!



Team Leaders

Embrey Bronstad
Brown and Caldwell

Margaret McCauley
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (Website)

Alex DePillis
Vermont Agency of Agriculture


Deliverables from the Arctic Research Plan

HEALTH 3 Provide research and technical support for water and sanitation infrastructure.

  • HEALTH 3.3 Test the potential for anaerobic digestion to provide sanitation options for communities where piped systems do not match environmental and financial settings. Document and disseminate results and determine if in-situ trial is appropriate.

RISK 1 Summarize currently available data and information requirements associated with hazard and risk mitigation, adaptation, and response efforts. Synthesize community-led activities and information to identify potential needs for future efforts.

  • RISK 1.3 Develop a network that brings together scientists, the emergency management community, and key agency contacts to share knowledge, identify new and emerging challenges, and inform decision-making and operations through research.

RISK 3 Research to support more resilient and transformative infrastructure to withstand potential impacts from acute and long-term hazards.

  • RISK 3.1 Develop deliverables focused on expedient and enduring cold regions infrastructure, including water and wastewater, energy, and temporary and enduring structures. Results will be shared via multiple reports that will identify and provide background information on the variety of available and emerging water/wastewater, energy, and structure technologies and best practices.

TCEP 1 Strengthen and streamline Tribal consultation processes related to Arctic research activities by enhancing coordination, transparency, and accessibility across IARPC Agencies and those engaged in Arctic research.

  • TCEP 1.1 Identify and engage with IARPC Federal Agencies and associated entities that have the largest volume of Arctic research activities that may affect Alaska Native Villages and ANCSA corporations. Characterize the type of activities that fall into this category, and identify opportunities for coordination and efficiency, as well as good practices and lessons learned.
  • TCEP 1.2 Develop a report of Tribal and ANCSA corporation consultations and engagement practices conducted by IARPC Federal Agencies and associated entities as they relate to Arctic research. This will include compiling a report on consultation practices (e.g., federal Tribal and ANCSA corporation consultations ) across IARPC Federal Agencies and associated entities using consistent metrics, highlighting key processes, transparency measures, and community engagement and reporting expectations. The report will include agency-specific consultation practices, links, and a clear outline of how Alaska Native and local community input is collected and used.
  • TCEP 1.3 Enhance IARPC’s Tribal Engagement Resources. This will include designing a strategy for leveraging the IARPC website as a centralized hub for Tribal consultation opportunities, reporting mechanisms, and accessible guidance for Tribes and Tribal entities. It will also include developing resources for Arctic researchers, including best practices and engagement guidelines that support long-term partnerships with Alaska Native Villages and ANCSA corporations.

TIA 1 Survey federally funded research technology.

  • TIA 1.1 Strategically engage externally, across IARPC, and within the Technology Innovation and Application Collaboration Team.
  • TIA 1.2 Use the Technology Innovation and Application Collaboration Team to support and coordinate technology-related conversations and activities throughout IARPC Collaborations.